As humans we have an effect on the earth. “Carrying capacity
is a scientific term that defines the number of individuals an environment can
support without degrading a population’s ecosystem.” (Robertson, P. 41) Each
area has a different carrying capacity. It also depends on the patterns of
consumptions of the humans living there. For example, New York Cities carrying
capacity is rather low because they do not have many resources being used but
on the other side they are being used at a much higher rate. While In Montana,
there are far fewer people using the resources and resources have the ability
to replenish themselves.
http://smcarthur.com/tecset/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Carrying-Capacity-Image.jpg
I should have known, yet I was still shocked to read in the
book that if the world lived like the United States and Canada we would need
4.5 earths to provide the resources we need. Also that if we did not add to the
population. If we added to the population and continued to live like the US or
Canada we would need to increase the number of earths.
Through out time we have had different stages in our
population that have lead us to the seven billion people that are population
our spaceship earth. Throughout the decades we have learned to use the
resources on earth to change the way we cultivate. By the industrial
revolution, humans had learned to harvest fossil fuels to make heat and other
goods.
https://cdn.thinglink.me/api/image/720682459275984897/1240/10/scaletowidth
As we plan and look to the future the world’s population is
only going, provided any natural disasters or plaques break out. The book said
“If cities double in size by spreading out over agricultural land, the impact
on the food production will be significant. If cities limit their physical size
but grow in density, drastic changes to the infrastructure for power, water,
transpiration and housing will be needed.” (Robertson, P. 44). I believe this
to be one of the wises and most incite for sentences in the book. By developing
our agricultural lands will lower our food production, thereby lowering our
food supply. While at the same time raising our population. That is recipe for
disaster. On the other hand, if we limit where we will can build, to a
reasonable degree that involves comprise and flexibility on both sides. It will
require us to be even more innovate and creative to create a city of the
future. This ties right into one of the Principe’s of the Earth Charter “Secure
Earth’s county and beautify for present and future generations”. (The Earth
Charter)
Honestly it reminds me of Walt Disney’s plant for EPCOT. He
wanted to create a Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow. The idea of
suitability was at the forefront. He wanted to create a place where people
lived and worked together.
http://esq.h-cdn.co/assets/15/21/980x490/landscape-1432079409-disney-city-of-tomorrow-1.jpg
With some countries not having sufficient water or land,
they are leasing or buying up blocks of land in more developing countries to
help the replace what they do not have. According to the World Bank and the
Food and Agriculture Organization “we believe that such land deals can be a
win-win situation.” (Robertson, P. 56)
No comments:
Post a Comment